Perfect Dark--what if?

If Nintendo offered to put Perfect Dark on the Virtual Console for the Wii, without any modifications, would you want it? Or, rather, would you wait to see if Rare allows Nintendo to modify its graphics, multiplayer, or other aspects of the game? Without any modifications, Rare cannot claim infringement made by Nintendo if they decide to put in in their Virtual Console...I think.I just think it would be better to get something instead of nothing--instead of being greedy and wanting it all. What do you guys think? Perfect Dark--what if?
i think they should should remake perfect darkPerfect Dark--what if?
I doubt it would go on the virtual console becouse of the fact that MS owns Rare.And PD is Rares game.Only way Id see PD going to virtual console is that if it went to both xbla and virtaul consolle
It will never happen so there's point in askingThat is a Microsoft game
Of course I'd want it. It was one of the best N64 games.It's really confusing who owns the rights to these Rare franchises which Nintendo published. Rare claimed that it's ultimately up to Nintendo to release what they want, but every other source says that Rare owns the rights.I just don't understand how Microsoft can release Banjo on XBLA, when they couldn't release Goldeneye without Nintendo's permission. It's a big mess really but don't expect Nintendo to release any of these games even if they have the rights. Recent months have shown us that the VC is extremely low on the priorities of Nintendo. They are not going to go out of their way to get Rare franchises on the service.
Not a snowball's chance in hell of Perfect Dark on the VC. MS owns Rare, and unlike DK, Nintendo has no rights to the Perfect Dark characters. If it's going to be anywhere, it'll be on XBLA.
Microsoft owns rare, AND there is aleready a sequel to Perfect Dark on the 360.
I already have it in original form, so I don't really care.